The Political Stage is Set

[00:00:04] Hello everybody, welcome to this week's episode of the Average Intelligence Podcast.

[00:00:09] As always, I'm your host Jake and I'm joined this week by our special co-host, our special guest co-host

[00:00:15] Haley of the Part of Your Broadway World podcast. How are you doing Haley?

[00:00:20] I'm good. How are you?

[00:00:22] Well, I'm good but I'm scared and we'll talk a little bit more about, no not scared, concerned.

[00:00:28] I'm strongly concerned.

[00:00:30] I'm scared.

[00:00:34] Yeah, it's kind of like you want to run but you don't know what direction to run in is kind of

[00:00:41] the general consensus I feel. But I want to take a moment, this podcast is brought to you in part by

[00:00:45] our friends at OMG CBD and our good friends at the Spur of the Moment podcast. We'll talk a little

[00:00:51] bit more about them as we go along. But we're here. I wanted to get your perspective. I'm

[00:00:56] actually really happy you agreed to come on because I don't think we've ever really had an

[00:01:00] in-depth conversation politically. I know it's really not your thing but you've said things a

[00:01:06] couple of times that I'll be honest kind of surprised me because again just assumptions being made but

[00:01:14] so I'd like to kind of dig into and once again I know it's not your thing certainly not on your

[00:01:19] show but what do you make of this swag mire that we're in politically speaking?

[00:01:32] I honestly feel like it's a shit show.

[00:01:38] It's a shit show.

[00:01:40] But what makes you say that? What I want to do is I kind of want to understand your perspective

[00:01:46] a little bit more because you and I come from very, very different walks of life and backgrounds

[00:01:51] and we have a lot of common ground in our entertainment interests but politically I

[00:01:55] think we're oddly similar but it's a little bit less surprising coming from me than coming

[00:02:01] from somebody like you so if you would dig into that a little bit deeper.

[00:02:07] Like I just don't feel like we have good options on either side like with Trump

[00:02:17] there's the dreaded project 2024 which I'm scared of.

[00:02:24] Okay yeah we'll touch on that in a bit.

[00:02:27] Yeah I might make you a little bit less afraid of it but

[00:02:32] not of the project itself but the implications but go please go on.

[00:02:36] But then with Kamala her policies don't seem like they have a leg to stand on.

[00:02:47] So it's really funny that you put it that way because so I'll tackle Kamala first.

[00:02:54] Some of my more conservative leaning friends are very, very

[00:02:58] I don't want to say afraid but they're concerned about Kamala's proposed policies

[00:03:03] but I remind them in order for her to enact any of them literally anything that she's actually

[00:03:09] talked about she would have to have the Democrats would have to control the House and the Senate by

[00:03:14] a strong majority and I just I don't see that happening it would have to be the perfect

[00:03:20] election cycle for them and even then like you could say they're obviously trying to

[00:03:25] mimic the success of Obama the Obama campaign in 2008.

[00:03:30] But the thing is we've gone through that as a society so now we know that on the other side

[00:03:37] it's not that it was particularly ugly but it's not as pretty as was promised.

[00:03:43] So Americans as a general society maybe some of the younger Americans not so much but anybody

[00:03:50] who was alive and voting during the alive and or voting during that time remembers when it was

[00:03:54] like all this hope and you know the promise of sweeping change and then eight years later it's

[00:04:00] now it was more the shame it was more the same I almost said more of the shame but

[00:04:04] that would also be appropriate.

[00:04:10] So I remind them of that and then secondly that even people in the Democratic party

[00:04:15] look at Kamala and say listen we're gonna vote for her because we're

[00:04:19] we're Democrats and we don't want Trump but realistically like practically speaking

[00:04:22] none of these things are going to happen anyway because Bernie Sanders tried

[00:04:27] similar things you know many many years earlier and they didn't stick.

[00:04:33] So that's sort of the oh I put it that's that's my silver lining if Kamala is elected

[00:04:41] in 2024 is the vast majority of what she's trying to do will not happen because I mean

[00:04:48] the country doesn't have a stomach for it. For example the whole $25,000 well actually I'm worried

[00:04:54] that one will happen frankly the whole $25,000 up to $25,000 for first time home buyers

[00:05:02] anybody who's taken econ 101 knows okay then the cost of homes will just increase by $25,000

[00:05:08] and we'll be right back in the same boat we were in which is probably my biggest thing about

[00:05:15] Kamala policy wise is the fact that she clearly doesn't understand economics like at all.

[00:05:23] Like say what you will about Trump but at least understands how money works because

[00:05:28] I mean exactly I say that somewhat facetiously but I mean it's true like yeah and you can

[00:05:35] and some of it's legitimate you can criticize Trump all you want for nepotism and

[00:05:39] you know being cut throat and all that but he still understands how money works

[00:05:46] and some of the policies coming from certain Democrats clearly demonstrates that they do not like

[00:05:51] and and a complete lack of knowledge in history of the world because I was just reminded again

[00:05:58] during the French Revolution price controls were one of the first things that they implemented

[00:06:01] and it was a disaster and then you look at the the Soviet revolution and Russia basically any

[00:06:08] communist regime ever implements price controls and people starve and die it they don't work

[00:06:16] and the fact that nobody on the Democratic side because not all Democrats are socialists

[00:06:23] in fact very few of them actually are and virtually none of them are communists really

[00:06:27] communist nobody on her side is saying yeah no this isn't first of all it won't work and second of all

[00:06:34] it's kind it's very much anti it's kind of anti-american if you think about it

[00:06:40] but yeah so here's the thing about project 2020 2025 switching years and I don't blame anyone

[00:06:47] who is scared of it because the way the Democrats are talking about it they're acting like it's

[00:06:52] not only Trump's you know policy goal but it's it's gonna happen like if Trump's elected it's

[00:06:58] gonna happen here's the thing about project 2025 Trump had nothing to do with its writing at all

[00:07:06] some of his former staffers were tapped by the Heritage Foundation to co-write it

[00:07:13] project 2025 is just a wish list from some of the most conservative leaning scholars and

[00:07:19] thinkers in the United States and I'm in the middle of reading it now so I can I don't want to

[00:07:26] misrepresent it so I'm going to speak to what I've seen a lot of the things in there as far as how

[00:07:32] the Democrats are reading it the biggest problem with it is it's very vaguely written so for

[00:07:38] example one of the things that it says and I'm paraphrasing here but one of the things

[00:07:41] it says is that you know a conservative president should implement policies that strengthen

[00:07:46] that strengthen and incentivize you know the growth of families in the United States

[00:07:53] it doesn't really say how to do that but people that are reading it can you can spin it by say oh

[00:08:00] so they're going to you know they want to push the traditional nuclear the traditional idea of

[00:08:08] the nuclear family so they're going to like outlaw homosexual couples from adopting from

[00:08:15] adopting children and they're gonna they're gonna take away gay marriage shut it up it doesn't say that

[00:08:20] it doesn't say that anywhere in there now there are some concerning things but these are the things

[00:08:25] that much like common as economic policies in today's congress will they just won't happen right

[00:08:31] they it's it's not going to happen like even and I never thought it would if you'd ask me this

[00:08:38] in 2006 I never thought I would say this the vast majority of Republicans are either ambivalent or

[00:08:45] actually supportive of like gay marriage for example as an issue like nobody nobody who has

[00:08:52] any actual power or clout is legitimately trying to get rid of gay marriage as an example

[00:08:58] and very few people there's a handful of crazies on the right that are like trying to make it so

[00:09:03] that gay couples can't adopt children but again like it's just so much I'm not going to say it's

[00:09:10] never going to happen because you never know crazy stuff happens all the time but so much crazy

[00:09:17] stuff would have to happen in rapid succession for that to actually and they would be fought

[00:09:22] every step of the way like as soon assuming that a law even got you know signed into a bill

[00:09:28] got signed into law the ACLU would be over on that in a second and we saw that not with gay marriage

[00:09:35] we saw it with the several abortion laws for example that were implemented after the overturn

[00:09:41] of Roe v Wade like the ACLU jumped on the vast majority of them you know and they're still

[00:09:47] fighting it out and Ohio was one of them and they jumped on that and actually had it overturned

[00:09:52] and now I think it's Ohio that actually amended their constitution and Florida is trying to do

[00:09:57] it now to get rid of like the state abortion law so I guess what I'm really getting at at

[00:10:07] the most basic level is project 2025 is very much a boogeyman that the the people on the left are

[00:10:14] attacking like I don't know if you watch did you watch any of the democratic national convention

[00:10:20] they brought up project they said project 2025 I don't even remember anyone actually saying it

[00:10:30] except poking fun at the democrats for bringing it up all the time at the republican national

[00:10:34] convention it's not it's not the platform of the republican party it's the heritage

[00:10:39] foundation saying this is what we would love to happen but they can't actually make it happen

[00:10:45] right right so for the prospective voters out there all I'm gonna say because I'm a fan of the truth

[00:10:52] is project 2025 is not it's not as bad as they say it is and even if it was it ain't happening

[00:11:00] it's just not gonna I mean now certain parts of it such as which this is part of it that I

[00:11:05] actually really like is they want to change the way I'm trying to word this properly

[00:11:12] they want to make it so the president can more easily fire like the heads of federal agencies

[00:11:19] and they want to change the way legislation is written so that they don't so that congress

[00:11:24] doesn't just pawn off policy and enforcement over to a federal agency which I'm actually a fan of

[00:11:31] because I don't like the idea of a bunch of unelected bureaucrats controlling more of my

[00:11:37] life than even my elected legislatures right not a fan so and that's the thing is when you read it

[00:11:44] and I actually fought the writers for this they wrote it so vaguely that if you're reading it

[00:11:50] depending on your political how you swing politically you'll take vastly different things

[00:11:56] away from it like if you're a really pro union like you know person that leans more liberal

[00:12:03] left you're gonna read that saying oh the president can fire whoever he wants it's like well that's not

[00:12:09] really what it says but it also doesn't distinctly say what it's trying to say so I can't really fault

[00:12:15] them for that it's too vaguely worded um but that being said not to put you on the spot here

[00:12:23] I'm not going to ask you who because I think that's very inappropriate do you know which way

[00:12:28] you think you're leaning as far as the election goes I don't know anymore because

[00:12:36] the guy that I was gonna vote for it uh went to the right so I'm like oh you were gonna

[00:12:45] vote for RFK too yes I was see here's the problem though and here's okay so when RFK

[00:12:53] I actually think it's a really politically smart move for him doing it the way he's

[00:13:00] doing because he's still on a lot of ballots but he's removed he's trying to remove himself

[00:13:05] from the ballot in battleground states and the reason it's genius is because the way

[00:13:09] election laws in the united states work is that because gary johnson did this in 2012

[00:13:17] yeah when a third party or independent candidate gets a certain percentage of the popular vote

[00:13:22] they are automatically their party is automatically on the ballot in all 50 states the next election

[00:13:28] so if you're not in a battleground state and you can still vote for rfk jr and you just can't

[00:13:34] stand trump or kamala we can still vote for RFK and at the very least your vote could go to a

[00:13:41] third party candidate being on the ballot the following election okay now if you're in a battleground

[00:13:48] state like you are um you might be partially screwed because I always I do point out the fact because

[00:13:57] I'm a big fan of voting conscience and I normally do vote third party normally libertarian but I don't

[00:14:04] I'm not like a straight ticket voter at all so but I usually do it every time I say it people

[00:14:10] are like oh you're throwing away your vote I'm like no I'm not because when gary johnson ran as a

[00:14:16] libertarian for president in 2012 they got six percent of the popular vote which is not small

[00:14:21] and because of that in 2016 the libertarians were automatically on the ballot in all 50 states

[00:14:28] they didn't have to poll or sue or anything so it's still worthwhile to do but you don't have

[00:14:34] the luxury of living in a state that's like in indiana where i am we're going tromb

[00:14:40] like we just are we go red 99.999 of the time we flipped an await for obama but that's the last

[00:14:47] time happened for a long time so I can vote my conscience and not really sway the election

[00:14:53] one way or another at least in terms of my state but you your your state well and to be

[00:15:04] fair right now it looks like your state's going blue it just does but it's it's it's a toss up

[00:15:09] realistically and between you me and the gatepost all the polling that's coming out showing kamala

[00:15:16] like riding this wave I'm not buying it I'm just I'm just not because we've we've seen this before

[00:15:22] we saw this in 2016 with Hilary every single major poll said she was going to win in a landslide

[00:15:29] until she didn't everyone on the news was laughing at the prospect of Trump winning an election

[00:15:36] it's like you just don't know and the way things are economically right now

[00:15:44] and this is why I still maintain that if it was trump biden Trump was gonna cream it

[00:15:50] because you now have four years under each president and particularly economically speaking

[00:15:55] there's just no argument like you cannot tell me that the biden economy is better than the

[00:16:01] trump economy with a straight face you just you just it's just objectively not true and what I always do

[00:16:09] is see that sucks I was hoping you would disagree with me but it's just that's what I

[00:16:14] mean it's just objectively not true this exactly this exact thing happened when I interviewed

[00:16:22] Justin like months ago for the for my fair lady episode is he thought I was going to

[00:16:29] disagree with him and then I ended up and he's like damn it I thought I have to throw

[00:16:34] you you want to throw me a curveball and disagree with me and I'm like nope

[00:16:40] no because I mean it's just and the thing of it is and I've said this before and you may not

[00:16:45] know this I've actually never voted for a republican in a presidential election ever

[00:16:50] neither have I I voted democrat once and third party all the other times

[00:16:58] but what I'm getting at I made the joke when it was happening

[00:17:03] biden's economy and economic policy was so bad that under his watch dollar tree became

[00:17:08] dollar 25 tree like the store dollar tree had a 25 percent rate of inflation

[00:17:18] that's insane it really is and I don't know like McDonald's had the dollar any size drinks for

[00:17:26] I think like close to a decade until the inflation set in and then they got right rid of that

[00:17:32] unless did they not do that in Michigan I don't know I can't I don't really know if we'd do that here

[00:17:39] they don't anymore I mean prior to don't they want anymore but like I don't know if they did

[00:17:44] it did vary a bit by location but for the vast majority uh yeah that was the thing that was

[00:17:49] happening four years that was pre-trump even like that wasn't something that started under Trump

[00:17:56] we've been in inflation for so long I don't even know when it started

[00:18:01] um realistically it started like like did did it start under Trump or did it start under

[00:18:07] okay so here and this this is gonna prove that I'm not or at least I try not to be biased so

[00:18:14] it started hiking heavily under Biden but part of that was the Trump spending but under Biden they

[00:18:20] got to nine percent okay which is which is just eight or nine percent but pardon the expression

[00:18:26] that's fucking insane it is at eight percent that's four times what the Federal Reserve aims for

[00:18:34] for Federal Reserve tries to keep it between keep it about two percent inflation see and

[00:18:39] here's my thing too is if it if Trump gets in office I'm worried is still go up

[00:18:49] well it is so to be fair um inflation is going down but it's still higher than it needs to be

[00:18:55] yeah um and I'll I'll I'll be perfectly frank just looking at proposals um

[00:19:02] inflation will go down under Trump unless he just does something

[00:19:09] insane but based but based upon Trump's first term I don't see that happening in fact I see

[00:19:15] inflation going down because under Trump's peak inflation rate as far as how good it was I think

[00:19:21] was like I want to was it at one point I think it was 1.6 percent so slightly under the feds you

[00:19:28] know projected I don't think it ever got above two percent until COVID and I think that was

[00:19:34] I think that was after Trump left office too I'd have to check the numbers

[00:19:39] but it was it was low like I mean you remember the Trump years it wasn't that long ago like it

[00:19:43] was scary in some ways but in other ways it was really good economically speaking

[00:19:48] I think my problem with Trump with Trump at the at the beginning at the beginning was just

[00:19:53] because just because I knew him from um I knew him from uh oh my god home alone

[00:20:03] and like I was like what the hell like an actor can't be prison in what the heck and I'm like

[00:20:08] Ronald Reagan oh well yeah true damn it which a lot of people and I see why a lot of Republicans

[00:20:17] viewed Trump as kind of like the second coming of Reagan and that was just a fun little similarity

[00:20:22] is the fact that Reagan was an actor and then Trump was a television personality

[00:20:25] and a lot of Trump's policies were very Reagan-esque some were even a little bit more aggressive

[00:20:32] a lot of people like the dog on Reaganomics but I mean here's the thing though if you actually

[00:20:37] look at the results and try not to skew it because bad things happen in every economy

[00:20:43] it's worth noting that during the Reagan years I think seven of the eight Reagan years GDP

[00:20:48] was at 3.6% and before and after him it was roughly 2.7 which doesn't sound like a huge boost but that's

[00:20:55] actually quite that's quite big I mean that's why you had the economic boom in the 80s

[00:21:01] you know that's when the Wall Street mogul became like a cliche because there was just

[00:21:06] so much money being thrown around in the economy and granted there were some issues

[00:21:11] afterwards some of it here's the thing about Reaganomics it's like I understand the philosophy

[00:21:20] but you forget that human beings are kind of inherently greedy so yes there's going to be some

[00:21:26] some of the ultra-rich that are going to take those you know tax incentives and

[00:21:30] breaks and just hoard it but there's a lot more that I'll take my business for example

[00:21:37] I would love to hire more people I would love to you got to see the taxes we've it's obscene

[00:21:44] just how much and how often we're taxed as a small business

[00:21:49] I can tell you if the Trump corporate tax rate comes through I'll be able to hire

[00:21:54] hire at least one more person I've done the numbers I've looked at it

[00:21:59] like because that's that's an annual salary and it's a decent annual salary for somebody

[00:22:04] with the money I'd be saving under the Trump tax plan the proposed corporate tax rate and tax cuts

[00:22:10] so that's not nothing

[00:22:13] you know and at the same time the the democrats just have a tendency to view

[00:22:19] everybody with wealth as just evil and that's just demonstrably not true

[00:22:25] the vast majority of people with wealth are actually really really good people who donate

[00:22:30] a ton of that money when they can and not only that they create jobs they build new industries

[00:22:36] they make new products that we all use and love you know iphone for example

[00:22:42] you know and uh when Kamala says she wants to implement you know price not price control

[00:22:48] so I'm sorry anti-price gouging legislation first of all the grocery store chains and

[00:22:53] the food makers are not price gouging that's not the issue the issue is inflation

[00:22:59] like if they were price gouging you would have seen like the cost of bread and bread alone go up from

[00:23:04] one company or maybe you know maybe all the bread companies we would get together and just decide

[00:23:10] that they were going to raise their prices 50 percent right that would be price gouging and only

[00:23:15] in certain areas like but when every single item in the grocery store increases by 20 to 30 percent

[00:23:25] that's not price gouging and then what's really fun is when you look at the actual profit and loss

[00:23:31] statements from a lot of these companies their margins are awful I don't know why they do it

[00:23:35] even in even in good years there a lot of them are actually in the red right now like

[00:23:40] they're losing money right now but they can't stop producing food because that would be an

[00:23:46] economic tax could you imagine if say like Tyson just decided to stop making food

[00:23:52] just close its doors that would wreck the economies of basically every single state

[00:23:59] not to mention drive the cost of food up because of how much they produce

[00:24:04] it would be a disaster I mean yes and no like but I'm just saying this in the pure standpoint

[00:24:13] I hate Tyson okay Tyson's probably a bad example I can't think of another food as shit

[00:24:20] yeah Tyson's probably a bad example but if they just decided to quit old turkey

[00:24:28] it would be very very bad now if a competitor came along and was able to kind of like push them

[00:24:34] out of the market that would be great but the consumer doesn't suffer at that point and neither

[00:24:39] does the overall economy like there's some people would that's the same thing same thing

[00:24:43] happens anytime there's an industry change it's like when you know the people that were breeding

[00:24:48] horses were very pissed at Henry Ford initially but that was also a gradual change

[00:24:56] like not everybody went out and bought a car the same day it was a very gradual

[00:25:02] right change in the way of the world

[00:25:06] but yeah so let's let's just dig into it let's dig into the meat what what what do you hate

[00:25:09] about Trump like what why shouldn't say hey what do you dislike about Trump she like where to

[00:25:18] begin how much time you got

[00:25:22] it shows only eight hours but like

[00:25:32] well one thing I don't like is I understand where he comes from with the whole abortion thing

[00:25:44] like with like up to a certain point you can't get an abortion abortion which he

[00:25:53] because I heard rumors too that he said like people are getting abortions up till birth and

[00:25:59] everything and so I can actually speak to that um I've never heard of an actual case

[00:26:07] of that happening however I know what he's referencing and he definitely should have

[00:26:11] said it in a different way there are some laws I believe the I need to actually read the law

[00:26:16] that's being proposed in Florida but I did read one I don't remember if it passed even

[00:26:21] but it was at least proposed in California where again it's a it's a vague language thing

[00:26:26] the problem with vague language in a law is that then it becomes open to interpretation

[00:26:31] and the way I read it it doesn't really have a restriction on timeline

[00:26:36] right so so in if I'm remembering correctly so I'm just but I'm going to use this as a

[00:26:42] as a hypothetical let's say you have an abortion law in place that enshrines and

[00:26:48] abort abortion as a human right in the state of California but it doesn't lay out any parameters

[00:26:52] then theoretically speaking legally you could theoretically abort a pregnancy up to

[00:27:02] and depending on how it's worded including the moment of birth it depends on how it's written

[00:27:10] so that's kind of what he's talking about at least in theory and some laws

[00:27:14] but here's the and this is the point I always make with pro-life Republicans is I say listen

[00:27:19] I think we can all agree that the vast majority because you always have to a lot for crazy and

[00:27:25] weird people the vast majority of Americans all agree that nobody should be getting an abortion

[00:27:30] at month nine like no no but by that point I don't think anybody is realistically proposing that

[00:27:38] right exactly and I and I also don't think that a sane human being would do that you know

[00:27:47] yeah yeah and I would agree with that which is actually this is gonna

[00:27:51] this surprises a lot of people I was actually okay with Roe v Wade as a sort of standard

[00:27:57] because when it comes to abortion there's a giant question mark that realistically needs to be

[00:28:02] answered before we can effectively have a policy on abortion and that question is at what point

[00:28:09] is a fetus considered a human life and I don't know the answer to that question and frankly

[00:28:15] neither does anybody else there's a lot of opinion but really the only scientific standard

[00:28:21] which is what Roe v Wade was basically operating upon is viability of the fetus outside the womb

[00:28:28] with I would say reasonable assistance meaning that like if you were like I think premature

[00:28:35] birth is a great standard because of a baby is born premature and it can live with some life

[00:28:41] support outside I would call that I would call that viable yeah in my opinion so I think

[00:28:47] that was roughly the standard that Roe was operating under with some latitude in the middle

[00:28:53] depending on like medical needs and doctor and one of them and that those kinds of things

[00:28:59] so I was actually a fan of it well not I shouldn't say a fan but I would I was okay with it as a standard

[00:29:06] I mean yes but in and this is my opinion is um I'm trying to figure out a way to word this like

[00:29:22] like we talked about like like the wordage was kind of lost a little bit in translation

[00:29:29] in in in Roe or with Trump in Roe and Trump yeah I mean it would it I'll be the first

[00:29:37] it's not perfect but it was the standard for a few decades so right is what the decision came down

[00:29:45] in the 70s I believe I believe I believe so so 50 some odd years it was the standard and it seemed to

[00:29:54] I'm not going to say it worked but it seemed to be the best alternative

[00:29:58] absent of a better one you know maybe it's just because I'm a woman but I just don't like a man

[00:30:04] telling me like well there's that too but here's the problem so I used to be

[00:30:10] I used to be pretty staunchly pro-choice not for any real idealistic reasons but kind of for that

[00:30:14] it's like who am I to tell somebody what to do with their body but then I was listening to Ben Shapiro

[00:30:20] talk one day and he brought up the constitution and I went fuck he's got a point I don't know if

[00:30:29] he's right but it's a point that I can wrap my head around the constitution guarantees the right

[00:30:33] to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness right so if that fetus is considered a human they are

[00:30:40] technically legally protected under the constitution so that's when I'm like shit now I have to start

[00:30:46] thinking about this again so that's that's why I always go back to that fundamental question

[00:30:53] needs to be answered and the really sad part is I don't think we're scientifically equipped

[00:30:58] to answer that question right not yet so in the absence of being able to answer that

[00:31:04] question for me the question then becomes okay I think trying to decide this morally is

[00:31:11] is not feasible right now so now the question becomes does the state have the authority

[00:31:18] to mandate this right that's a much easier question to answer because then I think then

[00:31:26] you start implementing standards and I actually I still want to have a conversation with Eric

[00:31:31] on this when he gets back because Eric's very pro life like very pro life and I enjoy debating him

[00:31:38] because he's pro life but it never breaks down to a shouting match because I'm just like I don't

[00:31:42] know about that and here's why but I think we can I think the vast majority of people can agree

[00:31:48] that certain standards would be easy enough to implement which again most of these were

[00:31:53] codified in Roe v Wade so I actually laughed though during I'm gonna draw those blinds there's

[00:31:59] sun coming in directly on my face and making me look like I'm worshiping or something that did

[00:32:19] absolutely nothing okay I really just didn't think to close the door it's hilarious anyway

[00:33:09] but I was like I was saying I was laughing during the Republican primary a bit chuckling not

[00:33:14] laughing but you know every Republican on stage is talking about like mostly agreeing on like a

[00:33:21] federal ban of abortion on like 15 weeks and I'm just like that's everything you're talking about was

[00:33:27] Roe v Wade like literally everything particularly um um I'm drawing a blank on her name I keep wanting

[00:33:38] to say Tulsi Gabbard but it wasn't Tulsi who is Nikki Haley Nikki Haley in particular was up

[00:33:44] there talking about like uh proposed abortion policy and I'm like you're literally talking

[00:33:49] about Roe v Wade which all of you are cheering the the repeal of but you're all talking about

[00:33:57] implementing Roe v Wade again right right exactly but I actually I did a video and poi did I get a

[00:34:05] lot of hate comments on that um it was a clip from a podcast where I actually called them all out I said

[00:34:11] all of you are not pro-life at least in terms of the way you're acting which

[00:34:16] just from a philosophical standpoint if you're pro-life like by definition textbook definition

[00:34:24] you should be anti-abortion period and none of you are because you're all talking about

[00:34:31] policies and exceptions and timelines and all this so it's like I don't know I just I called

[00:34:40] them out and poi did I get a lot of hate comments but it's okay there's a lot of things that

[00:34:49] don't make sense for the for the government lately with the whole TikTok fan thing going

[00:34:53] kind of go through whenever they this is make sense my favorite thing in the whole world was

[00:34:58] when Biden's still in the race um when it was Biden Harris HQ on TikTok which I followed them

[00:35:03] because of this every post so many people were commenting like what app is this

[00:35:11] and I'm just like yeah the the hypocrisy I mean don't get me wrong every politician's a hypocrite

[00:35:18] to a certain extent but the hypocrisy of today's democratic party is just astounding

[00:35:23] just astounding like I've been pointing out to a lot of hate the fact that the Democrats have

[00:35:29] been saying that Trump will be the death of democracy and yet you have Kamala Harris

[00:35:34] who has never received the primary vote from anyone ever in terms of for for running as president

[00:35:40] in the United States and yet somehow she is the Democratic Party's nominee for president 2024

[00:35:47] after never receiving a single because Biden need to go take a nap

[00:35:55] actually one of my favorite things because I do enjoy Ben Shapiro a lot don't agree in fact I

[00:36:00] called them out for getting getting a lot of things wrong in his expose of Kamala Harris

[00:36:08] which I equated to the political expose equivalent of the Hobbit trilogy in that it could have been

[00:36:12] done in one episode instead of three and it was mostly bad but um my favorite thing recently

[00:36:20] of his when Biden was still in the running he would just always be like where is he do we have a

[00:36:25] president it's like he has had a clear schedule for two weeks where is he and in fact when when when

[00:36:35] he first dropped out he was like is he alive says nobody's talked nobody's seen him

[00:36:43] you just like oh god what if he did die and you could tell even when he was running

[00:36:52] the debates that the man's not well but that's just it that's what I mean that's my broader

[00:36:58] point about the hypocrisy of the left so you had Biden and everyone everyone in the Democratic

[00:37:08] party in the news media everyone was talking about how you know vibrant and sharp he was

[00:37:13] and it was just demonstrably not true I mean and I always poke fun at what is going on with my camera

[00:37:23] oh no what are you doing okay there we go maybe I fixed it I've been having a lot of technology

[00:37:45] issues lately I don't know why I think I need to upgrade but um yeah okay what was this oh okay so you had

[00:37:53] yeah Joe Biden uh was under investigation or classified documents a la trump more on that in a

[00:37:59] moment and the department of justice basically came out and said we're not going to press charges

[00:38:05] because he's a senile old man who means well and on the same day the same day hailey the same day

[00:38:14] Biden comes out and does a press conference to show that he is in fact not senile senile

[00:38:21] and in said press conference proceeds to mix up the name of two world leaders and forget

[00:38:26] after he brings it up mind you because I don't I have to be careful how I bring this up because

[00:38:32] apparently during his line of questioning his son bow was brought up and in the past

[00:38:37] Biden has forgotten details about his son's death and all this or at least he he seemed to have

[00:38:43] forgotten details which I kind of hate to bring up because it's it feel kitty in this press conference

[00:38:49] Biden brought it up and he started sharing a story about a rosary that they got but then he

[00:38:53] couldn't remember where they got the rosary and literally something to the effect of like and we

[00:38:58] got it at anyway and then just moves on

[00:39:05] and it's like and then the debate happened which surprised no one actually it did surprise me

[00:39:16] because I made a prediction I said that he was going to be good for 10 minutes and then slowly

[00:39:19] started to tear a rate not four minutes in he just shut down like system restart and there

[00:39:26] were a couple of moments when he wasn't talking where he just was staring at the floor

[00:39:30] like he was he was zoned out and that was painful to watch but speaking of the hypocrisy of the left

[00:39:37] so everything that they have accused Trump of doing that they have done themselves and I can

[00:39:45] point to every instance so you know the classified documents granted Trump's thing is a little bit

[00:39:49] worse but then it came out you had a federal judge which fair enough was a Trump appointee

[00:39:54] but pointed out that the fact that the special prosecutor constitutionally couldn't have been

[00:39:59] made a special prosecutor so any of the cases that he levied are automatically dismissed

[00:40:04] constitutionally speaking and then he check Kirby comes out and tries to resue under the same charges

[00:40:11] it's like they're going to get thrown out dude so but the classified documents

[00:40:16] so Biden had the same thing arguably worse though because some of his documents for when

[00:40:21] he was a senator and he had zero authority to have Trump is incorrect but at least there's

[00:40:29] a legal argument that they're making where it's like okay we have to at least look at this

[00:40:33] and explain to him why he's wrong but there's a like senators just flat out can't do that

[00:40:38] and stuff that he had when he was vice president yeah so there's that and then the the RICO case

[00:40:45] against him is just especially juicy because this happened in the same jurisdiction even

[00:40:51] so the state Georgia case against him where it was basically an election conspiracy which

[00:40:57] I will say this much if the allegations are true Trump definitely broke the law if the

[00:41:04] allegations are true like he broke a lot of laws but so they're suing him under RICO meaning

[00:41:11] there's a conspiracy to either make money or get political gain under the Georgia statue

[00:41:16] the Georgia district attorney hired her then now ex-boyfriend to be on the case paid him double

[00:41:27] what the other attorneys were making and then they would take vacations together and she would

[00:41:33] and I quote reimburse him in cash and when asked if she could provide proof of payment she said

[00:41:45] well cash is fungible here's the thing if I make a purchase and the IRS asked me hey where's the proof

[00:41:57] of payment for this and I can't provide it for them that's not good enough for them like I'm still

[00:42:06] in trouble but somehow she got a way well she didn't get away with it she ended up having he either

[00:42:10] had her ex-boyfriend either had to resign or he was going to be removed from the case but

[00:42:19] so they're suing Trump for a conspiracy and then the prosecutor legitimately has a conspiracy

[00:42:26] I'm just I laughed I couldn't and then the whole hush money thing which yeah Trump did it but

[00:42:37] Bill Clinton did it Bill Clinton lied under oath about it yeah yeah I kind of forgot about that

[00:42:47] yeah Anthony Weiner Joe Biden has allegations there's no proof of payoff but their allegations

[00:42:54] there so that's almost not even a lot of politicians you know have sex with people and pay them hush

[00:43:02] money the hush money payment was not actually illegal it was the alleged campaign finance

[00:43:07] uses and then it morphed into this weird New York statute which is a misdemeanor unless

[00:43:13] you can tie it to another crime but apparently the way they interpreted it you don't have to

[00:43:16] identify the other crime that was joined to it it's a little it was weird it was very weird like

[00:43:25] wrong Trump absolutely did it I have zero doubt in my mind but it wasn't illegal

[00:43:32] is dubious it was morally dubious but it was not illegal it was not a crime

[00:43:40] but uh but yeah so then I ask you that so then I ask you then do you think

[00:43:47] do you think that he will go to jail no no no because I think virtually every case is going

[00:43:54] to be thrown out or he'll be acquitted so the thing of the New York one okay I forgot about

[00:44:02] the New York one so I'm gonna change my answer it kind of I'll be honest it kind of depends

[00:44:06] on the political climate at the time so yeah I'm gonna change my answer he might because he's

[00:44:12] supposed to be sentenced on September 18th yep for that the thing of it is the judge is a known

[00:44:18] Democratic donor his daughter works for a I don't remember if it was the the the blue

[00:44:26] she works for a Democratic fundraising organization which I think should be thrown out for mistrial

[00:44:31] but I don't live in New York and I'm not a judge so I can't I can't do that but

[00:44:38] this judge is obviously very anti-trump so maybe but if that happens

[00:44:45] I don't think you've ever seen a larger case of

[00:44:51] political backed lawfare ever in the history of the United States right because here's the thing

[00:45:00] they need to consider optics for this what they should do is they should postpone sentencing

[00:45:06] until after the election that's what they should do at the very least because I don't think that

[00:45:11] case should have been brought up against him at all but if you're gonna do it sentencing should be

[00:45:16] with actually any further action in the cases should be held off until after the election

[00:45:22] if for no other purpose that it doesn't look like you're sickening the law on a political

[00:45:27] opponent but that's the hubris of the left because they the thing is they keep saying the quiet

[00:45:34] parts out loud like you had um leticia james who ran for district attorney in uh in new york

[00:45:44] specifically saying not new york where's leticia james at alvin brag is the d.a. in new york

[00:45:51] ran for that office under the promise that he was going to prosecute donald trump and i'm like

[00:45:57] yeah you can't tell me that's not persecution of a political rival like that's textbook definition

[00:46:03] that's like running for the running for a governmental position saying you're gonna overthrow the regime

[00:46:09] it's the same thing it's even worse because you're citing an individual

[00:46:15] so yeah optically speaking that's what i think they should do and then if trump does win the

[00:46:20] presidency he can pardon himself for everything except for the georgia case and right i mean at

[00:46:26] that point that would be that would be not good politically and plus the governor of georgia as

[00:46:32] a republican anyway so he could just pardon him which is probably what will happen inevitably

[00:46:38] because trump i've read that trump is mending the fences with brian kemp who's the governor of

[00:46:43] georgia so i mean he can't do anything until the case is decided but if trump's convicted

[00:46:49] in georgia he could just pardon him might not look very good optically for brian kemp but

[00:46:54] if trump's the president that might be a that might be a must do i don't know it just it just depends

[00:47:01] but the florida case got thrown out um and then the the e gene carol case was a civil case so that

[00:47:08] doesn't have anything to do with trump going to jail or not just has to do with him paying a lot

[00:47:12] of money and then he had one more he had another uh civil case in new york where they're both those

[00:47:18] cases illustrated to me that they were just trying to bankrupt him because here's the thing even if

[00:47:22] trump were liable and i don't think he was certainly not for the real estate one um the fines imposed

[00:47:30] are just well and above the norm like hugely above the norm even for a multimillionaire and in fact

[00:47:37] what's this kevin oliri from shark tank was talking about it he was like you guys may have just

[00:47:42] done irreversible harm to the new york economy because what you've told people that do business

[00:47:50] in new york is that now for a financial misdemeanor you could be looking at hundreds of millions in

[00:47:56] fines so it's not that they're going to stop doing it they're just going to leave and the

[00:48:02] thing of it is what trump was charged with could very well have been a financial mistake not

[00:48:07] like nefarious behavior like something got miscategorized as an expense at the end of the

[00:48:13] day that's possibly what it could have been so it's kind of like and really you're telling

[00:48:18] you're telling me with a straight face that democrats don't misuse campaign funds too

[00:48:24] like seriously no i agree 100% with you i agree 100% would do like

[00:48:33] like republicans are bad but like democrats are like notoriously maybe worse they're all bad it

[00:48:40] depends on the politician right but yeah the thing is they're all bad and what i love though

[00:48:45] is kamala harris out here saying that she doesn't take money from super PACs yeah you do you just did

[00:48:53] you literally just did like you know that 90 million dollars that they shifted from buying to

[00:48:59] you that was a super PAC i was about to say i was about to mention that actually like yeah

[00:49:06] absolutely do i also wanted to mention this i don't know if you have you've been watching

[00:49:12] all her campaign shit i've seen a lot of it i've seen a lot of it have you ever noticed that like

[00:49:19] there's sometimes where she would slip into an accent like an obama-esque she didn't slip in

[00:49:26] she didn't slip into it that's 100 on purpose hillard clinton did it too different kind of accent

[00:49:33] but oh yeah what was the one she did this is my favorite was like mm-hmm girl you know i'm in

[00:49:37] these streets i'm like you don't talk like that ever you never talk like at least not in public

[00:49:45] that may very well be how she speaks at home but her and i don't know if this is true if i if my

[00:49:52] mind was just playing tricks on me or something but like i kept hearing her slip in and out of it

[00:49:56] too probably that tells me that she's probably it's probably not her normal

[00:50:02] vernacular yeah it's it's it's an act and i will say i don't like the whole routine of like well

[00:50:08] kamala is black when it's convenient but they're saying it because there's i'm not going to say

[00:50:16] there's a hint of truth to it but it is there does appear to be a pattern of kamala identifying

[00:50:24] which she does have afro-caribbean ancestry so i'm not saying she's not black that's not what

[00:50:30] i'm saying i'm saying that she has a habit of highlighting her ancestry of choice depending

[00:50:35] upon what environment she's in which is fair because she is biracial it's it's whatever i don't

[00:50:41] really care much about that because i i i despise identity politics it's just ironic because many

[00:50:47] many people on the left seem to be solely focused on the identity politics of a particular candidate

[00:50:54] but then when somebody criticizes and they're like that's racist is like well you guys brought

[00:50:58] it up you know i mean you guys were really the first ones to draw attention to this i mean yeah true

[00:51:08] so but i again much like the obama birthing thing i i'm just like guys come on you're better than this

[00:51:16] you know you're you're you're better than this there's plenty to criticize her about you

[00:51:21] don't have to call her out for not being black enough but then when she but then when she

[00:51:28] fronts an accent it's kind of hard not to so i get it i i get the i get the mentality

[00:51:36] i don't know if you saw rfk and i know her name and i'm just spacing on rfk's former running mate

[00:51:43] financed an ad a trump derangement syndrome political ad it is fucking hilarious oh i haven't

[00:51:50] seen that oh it's so i'll send it i'll find it and send it to you it is so funny it is so

[00:51:55] funny because it mimics it mimics like a pharmaceutical commercial and the drug in this commercial is

[00:52:02] independent and it's like independent might cause an increase in critical thinking skills

[00:52:10] it's it's great it's so funny um but yeah um what were your thoughts about rfk dropping out

[00:52:19] and dorsing trump and also tolsey gabbert a former democrat doing the the same recently i think

[00:52:25] just a few days after rfk i got sad when rfk dropped out i got really sad i was like

[00:52:33] i can't vote for anybody okay let's let i that's the question i want to ask you what

[00:52:41] you're tracking to rfk because i'm i'm curious about that because unlike trump and unlike

[00:52:52] kamala and biden oh by the way i'm just i'm just gonna correct you you can't pronounce it that way

[00:52:58] it's racist that's that's what they're saying kamala or is it kamala kamala okay you have

[00:53:07] to pronounce even though even though people of color at the dnc mispronounced it apparently

[00:53:12] if you say kamala it's racist it's kamala that's so weird i've heard it i've never heard it well

[00:53:20] no i've heard it both ways okay uh but yeah both of those both from an

[00:53:30] uh kamala like i just i hate it like that we have no good

[00:53:40] president we have no good people to run and like both of the uh trump

[00:53:50] like the republican and the democrats they're both corrupt at least to me oh yeah so i

[00:53:59] so i think in my opinion rfk is like just right down right down the fair middle that's why i like him

[00:54:12] and that's that's very fair that's very much a similar opinion i had of him but we're really

[00:54:17] attracted see here's the funny thing about rfk this is going back a ways i first dismissed him

[00:54:21] as a nutcase because that's what the media was saying but then i heard him i heard him on a podcast

[00:54:28] and i heard him talk for about an hour and a half and by the end of the hour and a half

[00:54:32] i'm like this guy's not crazy at all like he's a little kooky in some ways but he's not crazy

[00:54:42] right yeah i was just i was checking if you still hear me no i still hear yeah yeah right no

[00:54:49] and then i really love i haven't read his book yet the real dr falch i'm kind of scared to

[00:54:53] read it because i've heard some of the things that are alleged in it and i'm just over here

[00:54:58] i'm like if half the crap in this book is true i'm just going to be sick to my stomach like it's

[00:55:03] just i will lose all hope so i'm kind of i'm not looking forward to reading it but i feel like i must

[00:55:11] and i'm actually a little i'm encouraged though because from what i understand sort of the

[00:55:16] agreement is rfk is going to drop out and endorse trump in exchange for a position in his

[00:55:21] cabinet should he win the election and i have a feeling i have a feeling he'll be put in charge

[00:55:26] of things like agriculture or be in a position like maybe he's going to be made head of the fda

[00:55:31] or the cdc or something along those lines um and i'm all for that shit i want rfk to tear that

[00:55:39] sucker down that just reminded me of something too like there was this video and i have to find it

[00:55:48] and send it to you later if i if i can find it but there was a video that said like well

[00:55:56] uh rk only is endorsing trump and and getting us a job at that job there

[00:56:06] because he asked the uh the democrats for a job and and and they said no

[00:56:15] right even from my understanding they didn't even say no they refused to even talk to him

[00:56:19] really yeah apparently he reached out to the kamala campaign

[00:56:22] and here's the another reason i really like rfk is this move that he's just made really does

[00:56:30] strike me as a move from a person who really doesn't care about being president per se he cares about

[00:56:37] accomplishing the goals that he has and his major goal is he wants to end the chronic

[00:56:42] disease epidemic in the united states and that really comes down to food and pharmaceuticals

[00:56:49] and he wants to and and obviously certain types of pollutions as well which rfk's career is made off

[00:56:54] of that and i'm just like let this man cook and trump i will say trump is the kind of person

[00:57:02] that based on what i've seen will just get out of his way and let him do his thing so in that

[00:57:08] i'm hopeful um yeah i gotta say and it it might be be i'm not really scared of a second trump

[00:57:19] presidency because when you really when you get out of the the fear-mongering echo chamber and

[00:57:25] look at the trump years did anything and this is a legitimate question because i might be out of

[00:57:30] a loop on certain things did anything bad really happen to any particular minority group like

[00:57:36] really when you get down to it i mean was anybody really denied major rights i know there

[00:57:44] was a whole kerfluffle about trans people serving in the military but there is that

[00:57:51] and then this moment i think like this more recent one that he said if he comes back in like

[00:58:01] um he was gonna still do that too here's the thing about this and i'm not trying to

[00:58:11] i'm gonna word this carefully because i don't want to screw that up i've got if i were president

[00:58:19] i'd have zero issue with transgender people serving in the military however there is a question

[00:58:24] when it comes to two areas one is which this is a question anyway in terms of insurance and

[00:58:31] state-sponsored insurance in the army and stuff like that is elective medical procedures and what's

[00:58:35] considered elective what's considered medically necessary those kinds of things and primarily

[00:58:39] who is going to be in a combat zone like an active fighting combat zone

[00:58:47] there could potentially be and a potential issue is not necessarily enough to dissuade

[00:58:53] something from happening i'm just saying there are conversations that would need to be had

[00:58:56] if someone is on you know replacement hormones in a combat zone that could potentially lead

[00:59:02] to some really really bad situations going down right i'm not saying that should definitively be the

[00:59:10] case i'm saying right there should be some exploration there should be some conversation

[00:59:16] some exploration there and then at the end after seeing all the data then you make an

[00:59:20] informed decision i think trump may have jumped the gun a little bit there but i also wasn't in

[00:59:33] in like sports and everything which i first time was like what doesn't make sense but now

[00:59:39] thinking about it i'm like yeah it kind of depends on which i find that you'll appreciate the humor

[00:59:46] in this um so i'm a pro wrestling fan have a pro wrestling podcast in all elite wrestling there

[00:59:55] is a wrestler named nyla rose who is actually a transgender woman and pro wrestling is like

[01:00:01] the only sport because it's not real it's a cooperative performance where and this is what

[01:00:07] kills me is they have intergender matches all the time in pro wrestling and yet there are still

[01:00:12] people that are like nyla rose shouldn't be in the ring with women i'm like it's pro wrestling

[01:00:17] people it ain't fucking real it's not real this is like one of the few areas where there is no

[01:00:25] discussion this is fine there's no problem and it's like two like my i was talking to a family

[01:00:36] member and they would like i don't think uh trans uh men should be in sports because um like

[01:00:47] in i don't know yeah trans men shouldn't be in sports because they're stronger like the men

[01:00:59] are stronger than the woman so it's like i mean so here's the thing um and actually

[01:01:07] jordan peterson illustrates this honestly pound per pound on average like men might have a slight

[01:01:14] edge but the thing of it is especially when you get into areas like professional athletics or the

[01:01:18] olympics at the poles of the given spectrum those are the extremes so yeah like let's take uh

[01:01:25] i mean this is a good example because of the fowlin fox incident so let's take into account

[01:01:32] something like mixed martial arts at the top tier those men are pretty significantly stronger and

[01:01:40] faster than the women of kind of like equal standing in their division so when you have

[01:01:46] somebody like fowlin fox comes along who was born i don't remember when fowlin fox transitioned but

[01:01:51] it well into adulthood after having two children right um i could see that as a problem however

[01:01:58] it's also worth noting that fowlin fox was beaten later by a biological woman so

[01:02:04] but it's also worth noting that fowlin fox when fowlin fox was competing as a man

[01:02:11] he was like i mean abysmally bad like i think number like number in the 200s somewhere

[01:02:19] like was not doing good kind of similar to the whole um um lea thomas argument

[01:02:25] like when lea thomas was competing in the men's swimming divisions they were like

[01:02:29] you know or like just mediocre at best and then lea transitions and all the sudden you

[01:02:36] know breaking records left right in center right so but then and and then you have like one of

[01:02:45] family members also saying well and they also shouldn't be using the same same bathroom that's like

[01:02:54] okay so i have i have kind of an interesting perspective on that um

[01:02:59] i think the big issue with that is honestly the insistence on policy because at the end of the

[01:03:04] at the end of the day right this is the way i look at it no woman ever wants to use the men's bathroom

[01:03:15] by choice right because it's just it's it's not a good show and i would make the case that

[01:03:26] a a male presenting individual walking into a women's bathroom will make the vast

[01:03:33] majority of people uncomfortable yeah yes i agree so the only thing that changes are you

[01:03:40] have a fringe group of individuals that for whatever reason want to use that particular bathroom

[01:03:44] i think if you if they were just not insistent on making it policy nobody would give a s*** right

[01:03:56] because if you have a if you have a trans woman who is female presenting walks into a bathroom

[01:04:02] nobody's gonna give it a second glance right very few people at work somebody might be like wow

[01:04:08] that's a very tall woman you know like it just it just depends and they're women they're a tall women

[01:04:14] and a trans man that wants to use a men's bathroom just go to a stall nobody's gonna

[01:04:17] no one's gonna give you a second glance right but it's the insistence on making it policy

[01:04:24] i think is where it all sprang up because yeah if they just left it alone i don't think anybody

[01:04:31] really would have given a s*** like nobody bats an eye when a mother brings her young son into a

[01:04:35] women's restroom because it's just like i mean very young like not old enough to go by himself

[01:04:44] right like it's just listen we're here to use a bathroom like

[01:04:52] to my knowledge there aren't like rave parties happening in women's restrooms so i don't

[01:04:56] unless there are in which case hey maybe you want to be in on the fun i don't know but

[01:05:01] to my knowledge that doesn't happen so i just happen okay so i just don't understand it that

[01:05:07] just doesn't happen it's not glee you can't it's not but like i said like a lot of things i think

[01:05:16] it's the insistence on making it into a law and telling people you have to tolerate this

[01:05:21] that instantly makes a lot of people not want to tolerate it because they're being told to

[01:05:27] whereas i think like if you live in a community and you know someone who is trans

[01:05:32] like if i if i knew a trans individual at my job or whatever and this person wanted to use the

[01:05:39] men's bathroom i wouldn't give a s*** i wouldn't care because again there's no parties happening in

[01:05:47] there it's just it's not that big of a thing but they've made it a big thing and each side

[01:05:53] blames the other for making it a big thing and i'm just over here like well you guys did propose the

[01:05:57] law first so it's not our fault that you're kind of being a little bit transphobic with that but okay

[01:06:06] i don't even remember where that started i don't either maybe we should just dig like find out

[01:06:14] where that started and then kind of be like look how ridiculous this is

[01:06:19] but at the same time i can see especially if you're looking at hypothetical situations

[01:06:26] i can see both sides of it i really can but at the end of the day i'm over here just like

[01:06:31] we're talking about using the bathroom it's not that big of a deal it's not that big of a deal

[01:06:37] just go just go where right just f***ing go right actually to punish both sides we should

[01:06:46] just implement a policy of all bathrooms being intergender and then just be like see what you've

[01:06:51] done i told my mom i was like you know what if trump wins in in like 10 like i don't know

[01:07:02] in 15 years when i turn 35 i will run for f***ing presidents you should nobody would f*** with

[01:07:11] you i got a chair i gotta frame ram myself into your knees no i'm just saying you look at him and

[01:07:18] be like i told you you were wrong now actually here's the solution just put in european style

[01:07:25] stalls in every bathroom and just make them gender neutral exactly no urinals know nothing just

[01:07:31] give everybody privacy end of problem yeah see we just we just solved the crisis we solved the

[01:07:38] issue it's weird why don't stalls go all the way to the ground it's so odd i don't know it's so odd

[01:07:52] i don't even know how long we've been going about an hour ish trying to think so okay we covered rfk

[01:07:59] we covered com so what what about kamala do you not like because we picked on trump enough now

[01:08:04] let's now let's hone in on the true evil i mean kamala i don't think she's evil i'm being

[01:08:11] hyperbolic i think she's ignorant i don't think she's evil i mean i'm just kidding i'm just kidding

[01:08:16] i'm like i mean i mean kind of i'm just totally kidding kind of that kind of i i adhere to the

[01:08:26] jordan peterson axiom who i'm sure he didn't get this himself but these who i heard say it is

[01:08:31] whenever you're looking at something bad in politics or even just anywhere always assume

[01:08:38] incompetence before malevolence because most things happen because somebody's made a mistake not so much

[01:08:45] because they're just that evil intentions except hitler that son of a bitch was evil like that wasn't

[01:08:52] a mistake but usually it's because somebody's being a moron so we got kamala what are having

[01:09:06] okay i want to say this kamala is like a halfway see i'm surprised here in coming coming from

[01:09:13] you because the vast majority of her voter voter base just seems enthralled with the fact that she's

[01:09:18] a woman and she's a racial minority she's a woman yes i love that that that we could have a woman

[01:09:24] president but this is the wrong the wrong woman president that i've heard actually so many people

[01:09:33] say that in private and most of them would never say it in public they're like listen

[01:09:36] i'd love to have a woman in the white house just this one and a lot of people said the same

[01:09:42] thing about hillary by the way because they were like listen i'd love to have a woman in the white

[01:09:47] house just not her and by not being with kamala does not mean that you are not it doesn't mean

[01:09:56] that you're sexist or against the idea of a woman being president it's the whole thing about

[01:10:02] you know disney saying that people didn't like the new star wars trilogy because rey was a

[01:10:08] woman it's like no we actually generally speaking there are some assholes out there they're just like

[01:10:13] i don't want no woman in my star wars but it's like we all loved princess leah they loved the

[01:10:21] prince layer because of the gold bikini let's be honest i would say no because she was popular

[01:10:27] going from the first film the gold bikini didn't hurt certainly saw a spike in popular in the

[01:10:34] 80s but no i think princess leah was pretty well beloved since the word go and then plus you

[01:10:39] can point out you know in the 80s you had your sarah connor and your uh ripply from the alien franchise

[01:10:46] like people are not generally speaking audiences are not anti women being in leading roles and

[01:10:52] leading action roles even though jennifer laurence thinks she was the first one but i digress

[01:10:59] the fact that she said that with a straight face i was just like

[01:11:03] like you work in hollywood

[01:11:08] like you it's where do you work you should know this but yeah so kamala's incompetent what else

[01:11:19] because i'm loving this that's all i got that does seem to be the biggest issue though i will say

[01:11:27] is kamala's lack of understanding and the fact that look some people are just not good public

[01:11:36] speakers kamala's different because when she's on script she's fantastic she can read a teleprompter

[01:11:42] like biden wishes he could like when she's on script she's generally speaking really good

[01:11:50] when she's off script it is painful to watch and i would give her this i will give her this though

[01:11:58] she doesn't call her um because now that she's running for president who wait who's her um

[01:12:12] is it yeah her tim tim tim walls pin malt at least um at least uh she doesn't call tim waltz

[01:12:24] by the wrong name because we remember when biden called kamala trump vice president trump i love

[01:12:33] that that was so great i wouldn't have picked vice president trump if she wasn't

[01:12:42] oh i cried i was crying i was laughing so hard well and the here's the thing about

[01:12:49] biden's thing because everybody screws up a name here and there it's the thing that happens what

[01:12:54] was biden happened every time he spoke yeah it'd be one thing like it's a flub and i actually jay

[01:13:01] vance did one the other day but he corrected himself like a few seconds later um and believe you

[01:13:06] me you're gonna see that clip and i before anybody gives him grief i'm not a fan of jay devance at all

[01:13:14] but i will say you're gonna see that clip circulating all around the news media and

[01:13:17] they're gonna chop off the part where he corrected himself like literally not even two

[01:13:21] seconds later because he realized what he did and then he that he misspoke and he corrected himself

[01:13:30] i'm gonna get a lot of hate for this but are you talking about the fuck's the couch guy a

[01:13:34] fuck's the couch guy i have not looked into that yet i highly doubt that's accurate but actually

[01:13:42] it's in his book it's in his book okay i'm gonna have to okay i'm gonna have to do it when he was 15

[01:13:49] oh okay yeah um yeah i'm talking about the fuck's the couch guy then um but next week

[01:13:59] i'm gonna do an a deep dive on jay devance just like i did for kamala um and as i said in that video

[01:14:05] i would do one on trump but we've done so many deep dives on trump it would just be repetitive at this

[01:14:09] point you can go back and watch all the trump episodes we did back when he was president and

[01:14:14] when he was going through the court cases it's it's been done and actually we did an episode

[01:14:18] where you're graded as presidency too so you can that's all out there so i think i think next

[01:14:23] week i'll do jd and then in a few weeks after that we'll dig into tim wall so i was gonna do rfk

[01:14:29] but he's not running anymore so don't be a revived me of that what oh that he's not that he's not running

[01:14:37] any more he's running with and i will i will i will say this much though the so-called party of unity

[01:14:43] because remember biden said he was going to bring the country together democrats and republicans

[01:14:49] gonna bring them together need ice cream um trump has been endorsed in the same week

[01:14:59] by a leading independent former democrat and by another former democrat who was

[01:15:05] basically not forced out of the party but became so disenfranchised with their party that she left

[01:15:10] because she could no longer morally stand with what they are peddling that's worth noting that is

[01:15:17] that's worth noting that these people are so sickened because rfk jr was a former democrat

[01:15:24] too i mean he was a kennedy and they were both were so sick of what the modern democratic party

[01:15:30] has become that they couldn't stand there anymore plus they wouldn't let rfk run for president in

[01:15:35] the primary so he was like fuck you guys which i get but it's worth noting and i will say this

[01:15:43] about trump and his defense i still maintain that even going back to 2015 when he announced

[01:15:48] he was running trump never got a fair shake in terms of how he was presented in the media

[01:15:53] and certainly never as president day one they decided he was satan incarnate and i'll be

[01:15:59] honest i think that if they hadn't done that huge smear campaign i certainly think he would have won

[01:16:07] in 2020 and i still think he would have won had coven not come around um i think he would have

[01:16:14] been remembered as one of the better presidents and in a lot of people will say to that is

[01:16:19] like well yeah but all the bad stuff i'm like all the bad stuff he did was in reaction for

[01:16:24] whether you believe it was right or not most of what he did was in reaction to the smear

[01:16:30] campaigns that were being perpetuated by the democrats in the media because if he was given

[01:16:34] a fair shake he wouldn't have felt like he had to try to overturn i'm not going to say overturn

[01:16:40] allegedly if that whole thing is true because the elector scheme and i'll be honest i think

[01:16:44] he did it but it was based on a fairly dubious uh theory of the constitution but as eric pointed out to

[01:16:51] me after that happy everybody's like oh no it was bullshit he had no authority but then after it

[01:16:56] happened they went in and clarified it under law so that tells me there might have been something

[01:17:04] there but regardless he wouldn't have done that if from his perspective whether it was real or not

[01:17:11] the way he saw it the the election was being manipulated and if they hadn't gone through

[01:17:17] and changed a bunch of laws in the states which i think pennsylvania it still might be illegal but

[01:17:22] in some other places completely legal but the only reason they did that was because it would give

[01:17:27] the democrats an edge and had all that not happened i don't think january 6 wouldn't have happened

[01:17:36] um none of the court cases would have happened i'm totally sure of none of the court case and

[01:17:43] then did you see recently mark zuckerberg released a letter saying like oh yeah by the way they did uh

[01:17:48] direct us to censor free speech at meadow really yeah within the last couple days came out and said

[01:17:59] biden administration uh and then uh said that also they admitted to labeling the hunter biden laptop

[01:18:08] story as uh disinformation based on information they were given by the government but it turns out

[01:18:12] the government was lying and the laptop in fact was real was hunter bidens and yeah that's so

[01:18:20] fairly fresh you could look that up but yeah he gave an open a sent an open letter and just

[01:18:25] said like yeah they absolutely um and he said he regretted it he said we should have stood our ground

[01:18:30] more and yeah well and then when elon musk released the twitter files we all knew that because when

[01:18:40] he bought when he bought twitter before he renamed it x which come on elon stop it if you must

[01:18:44] have just name it twitter x because nobody calls it fucking x he just literally picked the letter

[01:18:50] of the alphabet that's all he did i don't know he likes he likes the letter x there's space x

[01:18:57] the model x from text which by the way somebody somebody pointed this out to me and i can't

[01:19:02] believe i didn't see it do you know that the tesla models all spell out the word sexy because you

[01:19:09] have because you have a shit you not you have the model s you have the model three which if you

[01:19:15] turn it the other way looks like it the model they have the model x and the model y

[01:19:21] oh my god somebody pointed that out to me and i was like i can't believe i didn't notice that but

[01:19:26] anyway and then i don't know what the cybertruck fits into that but i think that's a separate

[01:19:32] separate separate thing but yeah i mean that and that's the other thing that's just so

[01:19:39] i'm so mad about it that i just laugh now is like the blatant censorship that they still

[01:19:44] maintain they didn't do msnbc just got caught uh editing a clip of the joe rogan podcast which i

[01:19:51] watched that episode i remember him saying this he was talking about tulsi gabard and they made it

[01:19:56] sound like he was talking about kamala because they edited it together and they did so as if

[01:20:02] joe rogan wouldn't notice the man who said it who has a podcast that gets more viewers than

[01:20:09] their network they didn't think he would notice and immediately come out and say that's not what i said

[01:20:15] here's what i said like just the absolute hubris of the left it's just funny that they thought that

[01:20:24] he's so stupid but well they also i remember when um he released a video talking about when he got

[01:20:32] coven and he listed out a bunch of the you know like uh therapeutics that his doctor put an

[01:20:38] on put him on and one of them was iver mekton that whole bit i think it was it was cnn because he had

[01:20:44] sanjay gupta on to call him out for that they took the clip they took the video that he posted

[01:20:50] on social media and colored it so that he looked jaundiced but the thing is that clip was on his

[01:21:01] social media the original was on joe rogan social media which again he has more followers than cnn

[01:21:09] so all people had to do was go to joe rogan's twitter page and look at the clip and say they

[01:21:14] discolored this it was obvious and yet again the hubris of the left and the left wing media i mean

[01:21:22] yeah i mean it's like we all knew we all know fox news is full of shit but we actually trusted

[01:21:29] you know the cnn's of the world and now they're no better i mean i wouldn't trust cnn or

[01:21:37] fox for the 10-foot pool when touch touch though either those channels for the 10-foot pool i wouldn't

[01:21:43] either so generally speaking if i'm reading a story i'll read both cnn and fox news is covered

[01:21:47] whatever they say that's the same is probably true everything else is bullshit oh i don't know what

[01:21:58] do you think of tim walls i don't know if you've seen too much of them i haven't seen too much of

[01:22:03] and when i do i just kind of block them out because i'm like i i i don't know no

[01:22:10] i get the sense that he's kind of a harmless dork um he is he is fairly radical though uh left

[01:22:18] wing speaking i mean he was governor when they were basically burning down cities all over minnesota

[01:22:23] so i mean scoreboard right i just i don't know about him i i i haven't seen much of him to make

[01:22:39] in my opinion so yeah they're not well you're not really seeing much of kamala or tim walls in a

[01:22:47] legitimate like certainly not in a way they're answering tough questions they've done one interview

[01:22:53] since she was announced as the nominee i think it was like 40 days later yeah well and what they're

[01:23:00] doing is they're trying to keep her out of the public eye long enough for early voting to kick

[01:23:04] in in some states and then they'll kind of deal with the storm personally i think which that

[01:23:11] debate's coming up but is it september 10th the first debate she has with trump it's coming

[01:23:16] i think so yeah yeah she's she's gonna crumble it's gonna be glorious so my sister's wedding's on the

[01:23:24] sixth and my sister and like i don't know if you heard about like how they were talking about

[01:23:31] having it on the sixth but then they changed it to to to the 10th and my sister was like so

[01:23:37] worried that it was going to be on the sixth because i was like they better not be the

[01:23:41] fucking debate i do not want to have people talking about this this politics shit on my wedding day

[01:23:50] i feel bad for anybody who's getting married on november 5th the officiant's gonna be late

[01:23:59] he's like i was in line to vote i'm sorry oh my god i mean that that debate is gonna be it's

[01:24:07] gonna be brutal it's gonna be brutal i'm not gonna be in line anywhere i could devote at home

[01:24:18] i get the mail the the mail and ballot but did you did you have to ask for that

[01:24:26] um i had to like each year each like four years i have to like submit for it i think yeah okay so

[01:24:36] so it's not an unsolid because that was my problem this is why i i i do i do think that

[01:24:43] the 2020 election was stolen but not in the way everybody else thinks i had a problem with

[01:24:50] unsolicited mail and ballots i have zero issue with mail and ballots at all because you have to

[01:24:55] request it and you have to prove who you are and you know da da da da da you go through a process

[01:25:00] and you request it somebody just showing up to an apartment complex and saying here sign your name

[01:25:06] here and we'll fill this out for you which they did because they admitted they did it it was part

[01:25:13] of their strategy right that's wrong like that's well and then that's why you mentioned that because

[01:25:22] i remember when like four years like yeah like four years ago um when biden got turned was it

[01:25:33] no it was how long ago what did um but biden become president in 2020 yeah four years yeah four years

[01:25:42] ago okay so i was right so four years ago like i remember trump saying like oh this was rigged

[01:25:48] that like they were like and then he was talking about how like dead people were like their ballots

[01:25:56] were being used it is worth noting yeah my father passed away in 2018 yeah and his voter registration

[01:26:10] came in the mail in 2020 oh after his after his debt certificate had been filled out in 2018

[01:26:25] geez my god i mean in indiana it would have taken a lot of work for me to vote as him but it's

[01:26:34] theoretically possible because he was still registered to vote two years after he was dead

[01:26:40] and had the state sanctioned that certificate that is wild to me well actually you know what

[01:26:47] it wouldn't have been that hard because i still had his old driver's license that was not expired

[01:26:51] so i would have just had to replace the picture somehow but it had the barcode and everything

[01:26:56] that they could have scanned that's wild to me so i'm just saying i'm just saying i would never

[01:27:07] have done such a thing i would have been too scared to because knowing my luck my ass would

[01:27:11] have gotten caught and frankly i wasn't worried that trump wasn't going to take indiana anyway

[01:27:15] but i mean it's i'm i'm just saying so in states that don't have stricter

[01:27:23] you know voter id laws if i could have shown up and said yeah my name's kim boger here's my

[01:27:29] signature i could have absolutely voted as my dead father that's insanely wild to me that that

[01:27:42] could actually happen so maybe oh man okay now well now i know him and apology then because

[01:27:49] i thought that that was bullshit well and the thing of it is a lot of them seem to be

[01:27:56] but now we've seen governmental apparatus i mean it's just to me it seems very obvious

[01:28:05] for criminal indictment well more than four four criminal cases with multiple indictments

[01:28:11] at federal and state level against one person you cannot tell me that wasn't politically

[01:28:16] motivated even if he did do something wrong bill clinton did shit wrong that was illegal

[01:28:22] fraudulent and he never got indicted because there was a there was a precedent that's like listen

[01:28:29] we're not unless he kills somebody on the white house law we're not going to go after the

[01:28:33] precedent criminally here especially for white collar grabs yep no i agree but then also i'm

[01:28:45] thinking you say that and then i'm thinking i just popped into my mind that like we've also made

[01:28:51] read into law that like the president is immune so okay so there's that's another thing that's been

[01:28:59] horribly misrepresented it it does not exempt any president from criminal activity because as many

[01:29:07] people pointed out they're like okay if that's true biden's the president why doesn't he just go

[01:29:12] to trump's house and shoot him in the face if he's immune because he's not he's not immune

[01:29:19] from criminal activity right okay that i thought he was no not not strictly now what what it does is

[01:29:29] it puts the discretion of criminal activity to a certain extent in the judge's hands but like

[01:29:35] the president can't go kill people like he'll he'll be put in jail in a second what that really does

[01:29:41] is it kind of i kind of jokingly called it the jefferson loophole which he really didn't need

[01:29:46] because nobody baddened an eye but when jefferson made the louisiana purchase with napoleon he

[01:29:51] technically didn't have the authority to do that so if he had pulled that today under that law

[01:29:59] technically even if congress had had a problem with it he could have made the argument that was

[01:30:05] part of that it was under his official duty as the president and therefore he was immune however

[01:30:10] congress could still make the argument that no it wasn't because you didn't have the

[01:30:14] authority to do that because that power had not been granted it would have become a bit of an arbitration

[01:30:20] at at worst you know right um right but by the same token if jefferson walked into the halls of

[01:30:26] congress and shot the speaker of the house in the face he would have absolutely been arrested

[01:30:32] and would be today you know so

[01:30:38] but that's the thing is like trump's even anybody who thinks that was a victory for trump is like

[01:30:42] well okay but all they have to do is prove that your actions as president were illegal and then

[01:30:48] you're still in a criminal case so didn't really get the it wasn't really that big of a win

[01:30:56] now not to say that i agree with the spirit of it because i don't like when any elected

[01:31:02] officials kind of outside the bounds of the law even a little bit but at the same time i can

[01:31:08] understand the president needing a certain measure of immunity depending upon what's going on

[01:31:13] because you just you can't anticipate and sometimes snappy decisions need to be made

[01:31:17] and maybe you don't have time to consult a legal scholar in the moment

[01:31:21] i.e. you know abraham lincoln suspending abe havias corpus during the civil war now

[01:31:29] i wasn't alive then i don't on paper i don't agree with it but i wasn't there

[01:31:34] but i think in that instance i think the this is one of the few times i'll admit this i think the

[01:31:39] security may have outweighed the um and people still argue about this i would have to know what

[01:31:46] was actually going down on the ground basically but i guess like what that really points to a

[01:31:52] probably a better example would be you know like the bin laden raid for example which again

[01:31:56] nobody had a problem with it but barack obama authorized that raid that ended up killing

[01:32:03] obama under international law that may be considered murder depending on who you ask

[01:32:10] even under us law that might be considered murder depending on who you ask the patriot act had given

[01:32:16] him pretty clear authority but i don't know you you could make the legal case that it was you

[01:32:24] know a murder for hire and under that statue there just would have been nobody wanted to

[01:32:30] you know get obama in trouble over it nobody wanted to you know accuse him of murder but

[01:32:35] under this statue now nobody could because it was under his official duties as president and part

[01:32:41] of his duties as president of his security of the nation and this is the number one terrorist

[01:32:45] who has actually killed many americans and i don't think anybody would make the case that

[01:32:50] this was a bad call so that's really all that was yeah no g the president doesn't get off scott

[01:32:57] for you because if he did um joe biden wouldn't have been able to do a lot of crap i think he would

[01:33:07] have too i feel like he would i feel like he would have so but yeah that's another guy that's

[01:33:14] never gonna be in he's never gonna be indicted i think it's gonna be hilarious though in about

[01:33:20] 30 to 40 years when all that stuff comes out about what the bidens were doing in ukraine

[01:33:25] and china and everywhere i just i'm gonna be like an old man just defying be like i told you it wasn't

[01:33:33] bullshit that'll be funny um yeah i gotta say not that i thought you would be uh like a kamala

[01:33:42] supporter but i thought you would be a little bit more anti-trump but um not to say that i'm super

[01:33:48] duper pro trump but i'll take him over kamala any day but i thought you'd be a little bit more

[01:33:54] anti-trump honestly i thought so too and i'm very very sad and very disappointed in yourself

[01:34:04] i'm disappointed in myself it's okay critical thinking can be difficult at times i know i'm sad now

[01:34:16] i've i've i'm not even gonna say i defended kamala i have pointed out that some of the

[01:34:23] narratives about kamala that are being perpetuated on social media are in fact not accurate not true

[01:34:28] so like i said i just i just want the truth like there's the whole bit about her keeping a person in

[01:34:34] death row and withholding evidence that is not true it's it's kind of true let me explain

[01:34:40] i can't remember the guys i can never remember the guy's name but he was he was on trial for

[01:34:46] murder he'd been convicted he was on death row and then there was a request for additional

[01:34:51] dna evidence kamala Harris blocked it initially but the reason she blocked it when she was

[01:34:57] district attorney was because of the mountain the literal mountain of evidence that they used to

[01:35:04] convict this man and i read that evidence and i'm like the fact that they asked for more dna

[01:35:09] evidence is a joke it would have been a waste of taxpayer money but later it came up again

[01:35:15] and at the at that time kamala didn't stand in the way in fact she urged then california

[01:35:20] governor gavin Newsom to grant it it was granted and it did not exonerate him he is still on death row

[01:35:28] so still guilty but that narrative is being perpetuated a lot on social media i don't think

[01:35:35] trump has said it specifically um but if he has i'll call him out for that too because it's like

[01:35:40] no that just and ben Shapiro did bring that up in his kamala documentary scamala and i'm

[01:35:46] like dude google is free this would have taken you five minutes to look up and see that the guy's

[01:35:52] still on death row it's like which makes you wonder what else they aren't checking you know right so i

[01:36:03] did it for you america you can watch that episode that's the kamala deep dive where it's just what

[01:36:09] it sounds like we do a deep dive on kamala harris it's a very boring episode because honestly

[01:36:14] there's just not much there it's a pretty boring episode well i don't know do you have anything

[01:36:23] else you would like to add politically maybe surprise everybody else nope nope that's it nope well i

[01:36:31] completely forgot the sponsorship spots so i'll do that really quick i'd like to thank our friends at

[01:36:36] omg cbd uh for helping make this podcast possible and if you were in the columbine or around the

[01:36:42] columbus indiana area and you have aches pains or any need of you know cbd also delta eight delta

[01:36:49] delta nine the various paraphernalia necessary um top to sasha at omg cbd and she can help you out and

[01:36:56] then also if politics isn't your thing don't worry we've got a ton of other podcasts including

[01:37:00] haley's disney and broadway podcast part of your broadway world podcast but if you like

[01:37:06] really nerdy pop culture i invite you to check out our very good friends at the spur of the

[01:37:10] moment podcast every week they do a deep dive on all things movies tv tends to have a bit of

[01:37:16] nerdy slant which i personally like which by the way haley um if he hasn't already he's going to invite

[01:37:21] you on to do a special episode where we're going to talk about non disney animation studios okay and

[01:37:30] i nominated you for dreamworks okay only because dreamworks only exists because jeffrey catzenberg

[01:37:38] wanted to flip off my choiseler okay that i never even knew that's hilarious oh yeah yeah

[01:37:46] yeah no that's legit that's legit because um uh what was the role there was a role to open up in

[01:37:52] the company and it was it was a big big title because michael eisenberg was the c e o and at

[01:37:57] the time i think catzenberg was head of the animation studio or something like that i'd have to look

[01:38:03] but anyway this position opened up and catzenberg wanted it michael eisenberg said no and took

[01:38:09] the position himself so then catzenberg uh said fuck you and got together with spielberg

[01:38:18] and a couple other people and created dreamworks and specifically the animation studio because

[01:38:25] they wanted to compete with disney and give them the little finger which they did for a beat there

[01:38:31] but it's worth noting that dreamworks animation is still the only dreamworks company still around

[01:38:39] so that's the thing that happened so yeah let's check out spur of the moment every saturday

[01:38:46] at approximately one p.m as they say one well they say 11 ish because they're in the

[01:38:53] pacific time zone but they say 11 ish so yeah i look out for that episode and uh thank you

[01:38:59] guys for enjoying this episode of the average intelligence podcast hopefully you're a

[01:39:03] little bit less average and a little bit more intelligent but probably not and i apologize

[01:39:07] for that but we will see you guys next week what we'll be doing our deep dive on jd vance but until

[01:39:13] then google is free so look up information yourself